FAQ

Is AI-generated code safe to merge?

AI-generated code is not automatically safe to merge. Review the diff, tests, requirements, and edge cases before accepting it.

Last updated: May 9, 2026 · Reviewed by ReScience Lab

Why it matters

AI-generated code should be treated as draft implementation work until a developer verifies it against the requirement and repo standards.

Is AI-generated code safe to merge?

AI-generated code is not automatically safe to merge. Treat it as draft implementation work until a developer verifies the requirement, changed files, tests, edge cases, and unexpected edits. Hal can make the work more reviewable, but the merge decision still belongs to a human.

Why automatic merge is risky

AI coding agents can produce plausible changes that miss product intent, skip edge cases, introduce unnecessary abstractions, or touch files outside the intended scope. Passing one check does not prove the behavior is correct.

Safer merge rule

Merge only after a developer can answer:

Where Hal helps

Hal is designed around PRD-native, reviewable coding loops. It can help preserve planning context, validation state, reports, commits, workflow files, and archive behavior so review is easier than reading an unstructured chat.

Verification rule

Before adopting Hal, inspect the source repository, review guide, and current release notes. Do not assume guarantees, automatic merge safety, or unsupported engine behavior.

FAQ

Short answers before you put this into an agent workflow.

Is AI-generated code safe to merge?

Not automatically. A developer should review the diff, run checks, verify behavior, and confirm the output matches the requirement before merging.

Does Hal make generated code safe?

No. Hal structures the loop and review trail, but it does not guarantee correctness or replace human review.

Related FAQ

Keep exploring the pieces of a reviewable coding loop.